>>758
キチガイの妄想か？

https://www.cnn.co.jp/world/35169284.html
この過程は国際原子力機関（ＩＡＥＡ）などが監視する。ＩＡＥＡのグロッシ事務局長はＣＮＮとのインタビューで、海洋放出が害をもたらすことはないとの見解を示した。
グロッシ氏は「海が紫や緑に光り、魚が死滅し、太平洋が破壊されるような事態にはならない。当然のことだ」と強調。
「北大西洋や地中海など、世界中で行われてきたこと。環境への悪影響は一切ない」とし、そうでなければＩＡＥＡが承認するはずがないと述べた。

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-56728068
The plan has the backing of the International Atomic Energy Agency, which says the release is similar to the disposal of waste water at other plants around the world.

"Releasing into the ocean is done elsewhere. It's not something new. There is no scandal here," IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said in 2021.

Scientists argue that the elements remaining in the water are only harmful to humans in large doses. With dilution the treated water poses no scientifically detectable risk, they say.

While the tritium is radioactive, it has a half-life of around 12 years, meaning it will disappear from the environment over a period of decades rather than centuries.

Radiation from tritium can be ingested, however, which is why fishing industry groups are concerned about the risk of it getting into the food chain and being consumed through sea food.

The risk of this happening is not zero, but the scientific consensus is that it does not pose a threat to human health.

Scientists also point out that vastly more radiation has been released into the pacific by nuclear weapons tests carried out by the US, UK and France during the 1940s, 50s and 60s.