>>474
再反論が有る。しかも上のインタビューは2009年。

Comment on comment by Nerem et al. (2007) on
“Estimating future sea level changes from past records” by Nils-Axel Morner (2004)

Global and Planetary Change
Volume 62, Issues 3-4, June 2008, Pages 219-220

figure captionから

Fig. 1. Satellite altimetry instrumental readings (P/T-A, P/T-B, Jason) are in need of
technical adjustments in order to provide an “instrumental record”. This record gives no
rise in sea level (Morner, 2004, Fig. 2;MEDIAS, 2000; Aviso, 2000), or at the most a very
slight rise of b0.5 mm/yr (Morner, 2007, Fig. 5; cf. Aviso, 2003, 2008). The group
commenting (Nerem et al., 2007) on my paper (Morner, 2004), argue for additional
“calibrations”. All those “calibrations” are of quite subjective nature and very strongly
debated. What they are driving for is therefore, in fact, an “interpretational record” ?
not a measured record. That is exactly the difference in our graphs. And I argue that my
graph fits the geological data base much better that their“interpretative record” does.

因みにMornerはこの再反論の中でNeremの反論が３年も経ってから全く知らないうちに
出版されたことに関してethicsに反すると述べている。